H3 in Catalhoyuk at 6690 BCE
The H3 haplogroup subclades from Catalhoyuk 7th millenium BC are matching the recent Kamma group in South India.
It is also pertinent to note that multiple H3 sub-clades under H-Z586- are present among Kamma caste. The parts of Telugu shows close similarity to some parts of Hittite. Some of the Hittite phrases look as it is in the Telugu language used by Kammas. The name Kamma itself probably derived from the ancient goddess Kummanu cult and from previous palaic Kammama cult and continued as Elamite Kamul and Luwian Kamrusepa. The Bronze Age Kamboj group probably adopted from this early Anatolian farmer group god/goddess when it spread into Urals and further.
The Elamite areas also contain some of these Kammamma cult
Pp. 103-119: “A New Reading of the Middle Elamite Text Shun I 9,” by Jalil Bakhtiari
There are four complete or almost complete unprovenanced bricks and twenty-one brick fragments from the site of Toll-e Bard-e Karegar in Khuzestan belonging to the only Elamite inscription mentioning the god Kamul. All of them represent exemplars of the one and the same text (ShuN I 9), written in the name of the Elamite king Shutruk-Nahhunte I (ca. 1190–1155 BCE). The text describes a temple that the king had rebuilt and dedicated to the god Kamul. In this article, a new reading and translation of the last sentence of the text that is divided into four sections and compared with parallels in Old and Middle-Elamite texts, is suggested. In addition, the brick fragments TBK 16 and 28 are reread and classified and TBK 89, 114, 122, and 127 are published.
https://www.asor.org/news/2021/06/jcs73-toc/
There are four complete or almost complete unprovenanced bricks and twenty-one brick fragments from the site of Toll-e Bard-e Karegar in Khuzestan belonging to the only Elamite inscription mentioning the god Kamul. All of them represent exemplars of the one and the same text (ShuN I 9), written in the name of the Elamite king Shutruk-Nahhunte I (ca. 1190–1155 BCE). The text describes a temple that the king had rebuilt and dedicated to the god Kamul. In this article, a new reading and translation of the last sentence of the text that is divided into four sections and compared with parallels in Old and Middle-Elamite texts, is suggested. In addition, the brick fragments TBK 16 and 28 are reread and classified and TBK 89, 114, 122, and 127 are published.
https://www.asor.org/news/2021/06/jcs73-toc/
Interestingly the area bordering Anatolia and the Mittani kingdom was called kummanu
Language features between Telugu and Hittite matching
Even some of the Hittite inscriptions seem to have deep match for the Telugu language. Looking at the following inscription ->
Muršili, after returning from his northwestern campaign simply states:
nu URU Ḫattuši arḫa uu̯anun ‘I came back to Ḫattuša’ (Annaals KBo V 8 IV 2)
I was probably not only one, because Puhvel goes even further and translates ‘came home to Ḫattuša’:
Hittite -> Nu URu Hattusi arha uuanun
Telugu -> Na URu Hattus ki tirigu vachanun
nu URU Ḫattuši arḫa uu̯anun ‘I came back to Ḫattuša’ (Annaals KBo V 8 IV 2)
I was probably not only one, because Puhvel goes even further and translates ‘came home to Ḫattuša’:
Hittite -> Nu URu Hattusi arha uuanun
Telugu -> Na URu Hattus ki tirigu vachanun
Analysis of Hittite texts show 3% match with Telugu which is equal or more than Sanskrit which is surprising since Hittite has more Indo European than Dravidian/Elamite & Caucausian base. The following cognate percentages uploaded by Nrken19 shows this.